Monday, February 23, 2009

SUBJECTS FOR THE FINAL EXAMINATION

N.B. When the subject does not refer to a particular author or text, illustrate your answer with at least 2 different authors.


1.       (Arch-)Romantic poetics – predilect genre and typical literary (sub)species
2.       The poetic faculty in Wordsworth’s view
3.       The Romantics’ poetics of metaphor and symbol
4.       (Arch-)Romantic metaphysics
5.       Nature in Wordsworth’s poetry
6.       Discuss the Wordsworthian line “Our birth is but a sleep and a forgetting” with a view to the metaphysical implications of childhood in the Immortality Ode.
7.       Types of vision in William Wordsworth’s “Immortality Ode”.
8.       The sensual and the imaginary in Keats’ poetry
9.       Elusiveness and ambiguity in Keats’ poems
10.   Archetypal significance in John Keats’s “La Belle Dame sans Merci”
11.   Gender stereotypization in John Keats’s “La Belle Dame sans Merci”
12.   (Arch-)Realist poetics – predilect genre and typical literary (sub)species
13.   Elements of satire in English neo-classical literature
14.   The status of the woman in Moll Flanders
15.   (Arch-)Realist metaphysics
16.   Realist elements in English Romanticism
17.   The realism of the approach and of the narrative devices in Defoe’s Moll Flanders
18.   (Arch-)Classical poetics – predilect genre and typical literary (sub)species
19.   (Arch-)Classical metaphysics
20.   Elements of form supporting the critical argument in Pope’s Essays
21.   Didacticism in Alexander Pope’s “An Essay on Criticism”
22.   Neo-classical features in Alexander Pope’s “An Essay on Criticism”
23.   Pope’s neo-classical aesthetics
24.   Pope’s philosophical and theological views in An Essay on Man.
25.   The comedy of manners and Congreve’s devices in depicting human flaws
26.   The battle of the sexes in The Way of the World
27.   (Arch-)Mannerist poetics – predilect genre and typical literary (sub)species
28.   The rhetoric of (Arch-)Mannerism
29.   (Arch-)Mannerist metaphysics
30.   Mannerist elements in English Romantic literature
31.   Mannerist elements in English Neo-classical literature
32.   Narrative and philosophical irony in Swift’s work
33.   The function of the theme of the stranger in Gulliver’s Travels
34.   Colonial encounters in Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels
35.   Perspectives upon the human body in Jonathan Swift’s Gulliver’s Travels
36.   Blake’s use of paradox and irony
37.   The relevance of childhood in Romantic poetry
38.   Archetypal significance in William Blake’s “The Sick Rose”.
39.   The nature of spirituality in William Blake’s philosophy.
40.   Explain and exemplify the Blakean assertion "Without contraries [there] is no progression".
41.   Mary Shelley’s narrative devices and the Gothic style
42.   Intertextuality and deeper meaning in Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein
43.   Frankenstein and the myth of creation

BIBLIOGRAPHY (Mandatory - Quarantine version, all texts infected with COVID-19 have been replaced)


Primary Texts
Al. Pope - An Essay on ManAn Essay on Criticism;
J. Swift - Gulliver’s Travels;
W. Congreve - The Way of the World;
D. Defoe - Moll Flanders;
Mary Shelley - Frankenstein;
W. Blake - from Songs of Innocence and Songs of Experience, from The Marriage of Heaven and Hell;
W. Wordsworth -  The Tables TurnedWe Are SevenImmortality Ode;
J. Keats -  La Belle Dame Sans Merci, Ode on a Grecian Urn,

Critical Bibliography
Bogdan Ștefănescu. Romanticism between Forma Mentis and Historical Profile. Editura Universității din București, 2014. Mandatory reading: pages 179-207 and 243-272; optional reading: pages 88-178, 208-242.
N.B. All exam topics/subjects must be addressed using the stylistic typology in this critical book, which has also been outlined in the course of lectures.

Sunday, February 22, 2009

COURSE PREREQUISITES

1.      Attendance or Do I need to come to class?
Attending is compulsory for 5 out of 7 seminars but only optional for the lectures. However, I strongly suggest you come to the lectures as well in order to get a better grip of the critical framework and of some of the primary texts for this class. (If you come for less than 5 seminars, you will fail the first exam session. Also, note that the grade for your seminar performance will be based, among other criteria, on your attendance score.)

2.     Seminar requirements or What do they want from me?
1. WRITTEN ESSAY (+PRESENTATION).
Other than having to attend most seminars, all students have to write a 3-to-4-page academic/critical essay.
-All essays are to be delivered as Word documents. One page is 2000 characters with spaces. (Use the Word Count function in the Tools menu in Microsoft Office Word.)
-Failure to apply the critical format  to a presentation, an essay, or the mid-term test will be graded as 2 (see Critical methodology for seminar assignments immediately below).
-All forms of plagiarism will be graded as 1 and will result in a FAIL (possibly in a recommendation for the culprit to be expelled).
-Failure to meet the deadlines (deliver the presentation/hand in the written essay/take the mid-term test at the exact scheduled times) will result in up to 2 points deducted from that particular mark.
-Most students will make a 10-minute in-class presentation based on their written essay. The presentation is to be delivered (not read !) in approx. 10 mins. and then discussed in/by the class.
-Students will receive bonus points for in-class presentations to be added to their mark in the written essay: 2 points if they volunteer, 1 point if they are appointed by the seminar instructor.
-Students must contact their seminar instructors and enlist for a presentation not later than the second week of the semester. Note: They are under no obligation to hand in the written critical essay at the time of the presentation or to change the topic/approach for the written critical essay.

2. READING NOTES FOR PRIMARY/LITERARY TEXTS, AS WELL AS FOR THE MANDATORY SECTIONS IN THE CRITICAL BIBLIOGRAPHY.
All reading notes are to be delivered as a single file.doc (Word), .pdf (Adobe) or .zip (WinZip or 7z) archive files.

3. Apart from these assignments, students will also be assessed for their PARTICIPATION IN CLASS DISCUSSIONS.

4. ALL STUDENTS (not just those on assignment) MUST READ CLOSELY THE SELECTED TEXT(S) for each seminar. Quizzes should be expected as well as verification of personal reading notes ["conspecte"] for each seminar.

5. STUDENTS CANNOT PROCURE A PASS IF THEY HAVEN'T SUBMITTED A VALID WRITTEN ESSAY. (“Valid” means not plagiarized and conforming to the format and methodological requirements – see section below.)

3.      Critical methodology for seminar assignments or How do I write a successful critical essay?  
The presentations and essays have to use a particular critical approach of the student’s choice (after consultation with the seminar instructor).  Anthologies of critical approaches are available at the Pitar Mos Reading Room where most of the course material is stored (ask at the Librarian’s Desk for R. Surdulescu and B. Stefãnescu - Contemporary Critical Theories. A Reader and David Lodge - Modern Literary Criticism and Theory).
Here is the required format for such assignments:
1) Main Assumptions (what literature is in his/her selected critical perspective);
2) Objectives (a. what that critical perspective aims for, generally speaking, and b. what the student’s particular assignment sets out to do within the range of the general objectives of his/her critical approach);
3) Means (what critical instruments - i.e., methodology, concepts, techniques etc. - will be employed to achieve the Objectives);
4) The Argument/Analysis proper (the main body of the presentation);
5) Conclusions (a concluding statement on the result of the analysis and a brief self-evaluation of the benefits of the critical endeavour).
All seminar presentations must use HANDOUTS (at least one for every two participants).

!!! MAKE SURE YOU DO THIS FOR THE WRITTEN ESSAY:
- Design a solid argument and a clear structure (headed argument) for the essay starting with the initial justification of your choice of theme and approach and leading to relevant conclusions.
- Identify and clearly state in the introductory section what is the problem that you aim to tackle in the essay and provide a brief explanation of your methodology and specialized critical terms.
- Use elegant and nuanced language (no colloquialisms or slang terms) without becoming pedantic and affected. Demonstrate that you can use the critical idiom of your approach.
- Strictly adhere to the MLA academic style in quoting and indicating sources, inserting notes and compiling the list of cited works.  (Purdue.edu)

- Do not forget to run a computer spell and grammar check and to double check it yourself.
- Insert all elements of identification (full name, year and group, course name and seminar instructor, date). We handle hundreds of essays each semester and it is not easy to keep track of them when there is missing info.
- Send your essay be email to your seminar instructor before the deadline and keep a copy of your essay in case it gets misplaced or fails to reach him/her.

4.    Sending in your assignments (1+2 above)
Deadline for emailing your written essays and reading notes: before your last seminar
a) - LOAD YOUR ESSAY (NOT YOUR READING NOTES) ON THE TURNITIN PLATFORM ! 
Essays will not be considered unless they are mounted on the Turnitin platform!  Create an account at http://www.turnitin.com/ro/home.
For Andreea Paris Popa's groups> Class ID 24754903; Class Key: SemLit1A2020
For Sorana Corneanu's groups> Class ID 24494293; Class Key: BritLit.
For Bogdan Ștefănescu's groups> Class ID 24754549; Class Key: ROM20.
When asked for a title write 2020 [LAST NAME] [FIRST NAME].
Find more details at Turnitin Guides (link).
b) - Also, ask your seminar instructor whether/how you should EMAIL YOUR ASSIGNMENTS.

SUGGESTIONS (TO BE CONFIRMED BY YOUR SEMINAR INSTRUCTOR):
- When emailing, always state your name and class/year in the subject line (e.g., " [LAST NAME] [FIRST NAME] CONC. LIT. 1A Assignments "), in the signature of your email message, and in the title of the files for your essay and reading notes. 
- The essay and the reading notes should be sent as file attachments to your email message. All reading notes are to be delivered as a single file.doc (Word), .pdf (Adobe) or .zip (WinZip or 7z) archive files. These 2 files should be titled “[LAST NAME] [FIRST NAME] Critical Essay” or “[LAST NAME] [FIRST NAME] Reading Notes”, respectively. E.g., STEFANESCU BOGDAN Critical Essay.doc
- Expect a brief confirmation email. Should one fail to reach you in a few days, resend your material and ask for confirmation.

5.      Computation of grade or How should I balance my efforts? 
The seminar grade will reflect:
1) the assignments (the critical essay/presentation) = 33% of seminar grade;
2) participation in the seminar debates = 33%;
3) attendance = 33% [5 attendances and over = 10; 4 att. = 8; 3 att. = 6; 2 att. = 4; 1 att. = 2].
The seminar grade will count as half of the final mark, the other half is the final exam assessment.

6.    Final exam or How will I be graded?
The final exam is oral. (Should you fail or miss the first exam session, all subsequent re-examinations will be written.) The exam ticket will consist of one subject to be prepared for about 20 mins. and discussed in about 6-8 mins.
A student may change the ticket only once, in which case 2 points will be deducted from the exam grade. The student may not refuse the alternative subject and revert to the original one.
A list of subjects and compulsory bibliography (readings) will be provided at the beginning of the semester. The primary (literary) texts have to be read in order to get a pass. Studying criticism instead and passing it on as your reasoned interpretation of literary texts you have never read will not be tolerated.

7.     Malfuntions or What if something goes wrong?
Should any problems arise regarding the bibliography and its availability to students, please notify the course director or your seminar instructor immediately. Excuses (such as not having found the texts in the bibliography) will not be accepted unless a solution has been attempted with the course team previously. All other malfunctions should be reported ASAP (as soon as possible) to the seminar instructors or to B. Stefãnescu.

8.    AVOID PLAGIARISM or Can I take the easy way out?
-Any form of plagiarism or cheating in exams, mid-term tests, seminar assignments etc.--whether enacted or attempted, fragmentary or integral, deliberate or accidental--will be punished severely (that is, a fail in the course for minor transgressions and a formal suggestion that the culprit be expelled for more serious offenses).
-Make sure that what you say or write are your own ideas and words. Whenever they are not yours, make that as clear and explicit as possible using quotations, references, citations in the bibliography, footnotes/endnotes.
-Stay away from non-academic sites like Sparknotes, Answers.com, GradeSaver, Wikipedia, ready-made essay banks/data bases etc. Use only authoritative (serious) sites where articles are signed, such as academic encyclopedias or the web pages of academics, university departments, scholarly societies etc.
-Do not recycle your essays. Write new work, do not use older essays that you've submitted for another class.